跪求！！！！！！！ 英文高手，翻译！急急急！！！

跪求！！！！！！！ 英文高手，翻译！急急急！！！

Dell Carnegie advise to young people:The controversial results of the two sides will most likely believe in themselves more than ever absolutely right. You can't win the arguement.If lost, of course, you lose;If won, or lost.Therefore, the best approach is to avoid controversy.
Two thousand years ago, Jesus said: "The opposition agreed that as soon as you people."
If others agree with you, please respect other people's views, not to direct that the other side wrong.Because it will arouse controversy.
Even in the argument that you won, so that the other side's argument was attacked in the Qianchuangbaikong to prove that he useless, So what? You will fill very proud.But what about him? You make him ashamed.You hurt his self-esteem, he will hate you the victory.But even if a person orally, but the mind is refused to accept.
If you always argued, disproved, perhaps occasionally can win;But that victory was hollow, because you never be each other's goodwill.
You may be justified in the debate, but to change other people's ideas, you are wrong in that you all will be futile.
Regardless of how each other's intelligence and wisdom, you can not rely on the debate to change anyone's mind.
The controversy is undesirable, even the most covert argument may not be.If you always refute, even the occasional victory, but never be each other's goodwill.
The real way to win is not a debate, but not controversial.

Dell Carnegie's sincere advice that gives to young people: The result disputed, will make both sides believe oneself even more than in the past correctly absolutely in eight or nine cases out of ten. You win and dispute. If fail, certainly you fail; If win, or fail. So, the best method is to avoid being disputed. 2,000 years ago, Jesus said: "Agree to object to the person of you as soon as possible. "If others agree with you, please respect others' opinion, make sure not to point out directly the other side is wrong. Because will be controversial in this way. Even you victory, make argument of the other side attack riddled with gaping wounds in not disputing, prove him a bundle of negatives, so what? You will feel complacent. But he? You make him feel ashamed. You have injured his self-respect, he will hate your victory. And even a person takes orally, but refuse to obey in the heart. If you always argue, refute, perhaps can win once in a while; But that is an empty victory, because you can not get the other side's good opinion forever. You may be reasonable in disputing, but want to change others' idea, everything is futile that you must enable you by mistake. Regardless of intelligence and wisdom of the other side, you can not be by argueing the idea which change anyone either. It is intolerable to dispute, even the dispute betraying nothing in expression and movements most is intolerable. If you always argue, refute, even obtain the victory once in a while, but forever Can't get the other side's good opinion far. The method to really win the victory is not to dispute, but don't dispute.

机译的都往这儿摆，还真敢

Please help me translate the following piece of it!
Dell `Carnegie's advice to young people: the results of controversy, most likely will make both sides more than ever believe they absolutely right. You can not win arguments. If lost, of course, you will lose, if won, or lost. Therefore, the best approach is to avoid controversy.
Two thousand years ago, Jesus said: "You agree as soon as possible against the people."
If others agree with you, please respect other people's views, not to direct that the other side wrong. Because it will arouse controversy.
Even in the argument that you won, so that the other side's argument was attacked in the Qianchuangbaikong to prove that he useless, So what » You will find Yangyangzide. But he is » He Zi Can you make. You hurt his self-esteem, he will hate you the victory. But even if a person orally, but the mind and refused to accept.
If Nilao is argued, argued, and perhaps occasionally to win, but that is an empty victory, because you never be each other's goodwill.
You may be justified in the debate, but to change other people's ideas, you are wrong in that you all will be futile.
Regardless of how each other's intelligence and wisdom, you can not rely on the debate to change anyone's mind.
Controversy is undesirable and even the most Buluhenji controversy may not have to. If Nilao is Taigang to refute, even the occasional victory, but never be each other's goodwill.
The real way to win is not a debate, but not controversial.

The Dell `card bears the base to young people's advice: Argument's result, will cause both sides to believe the absolutely correct most likely compared to the past. You could not win the argument. If has lost, certainly you lost; If has won, lost. Therefore, the best means are avoid arguing. before two millenniums, Jesus has said: “agreed as soon as possible opposes you the person.” if wants others to agree with you, please respect others the opinion, is sure not to point out directly opposite party was wrong. Because like this will give rise to controversy. even if you have won in the argument, causes opposite party argument to attack tattered and torn, proves him to have no merit to speak, that is also what kind of? You will think self-satisfied. But he? You cause him to feel ashamed. You have injuried his self-respect, he will hate your victory. Moreover a person, even if takes orally, but at heart and refuses to accept. if you always argue, the rebuttal, perhaps occasionally can win; But that is the empty victory, because you forever cannot obtain opposite party favorable impression. you in argument possible rational, but if wants to change others' mind, you on are wrong cause your all are the futile effort. no matter the opposite party intelligence and ability how, you impossible to change anybody's idea depending on the debate. the argument is intolerable, even links the argument which most not shows to be also intolerable. If you always bicker, the rebuttal, even if occasionally achieves the success, actually forever cannot obtain opposite party favorable impression. wins the victory the method is not the argument truly, but do not argue.

如以上回答内容为低俗、色情、不良、暴力、侵权、涉及违法等信息，可以点下面链接进行举报！

点此我要举报以上问答信息！